Welcome Guest! To enable all features please try to register or login.
Go to last post Go to first unread
Maya Adra  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, April 22, 2015 2:19:11 PM(UTC)
Maya Adra

Rank: Member

Groups: Active Forum Users, CreateAsoft Internal Admin, ForumModerators, IAnimate3D_ForumModerators, Registered, Registered Users, Simcad Pro Customers, Subscribers
Joined: 4/17/2015(UTC)
Posts: 0

Dynamic Simulation to Improve Patient Wait time & increase Operational Efficiency

One of the most unpredictable environments in the healthcare industry is the emergency department (ED). Excessive patient wait times can be tolling on the patient both physically and emotionally; affecting the morale of the patient, doctors, nurses and medical staff. Let's take a look at some of the most common contributing factors (and their implications) which lead to one of America's biggest challenges in the healthcare community today – optimizing the ED to reduce patient wait times and increase overall efficiency.

Several elements can be attributed to increased patient wait times including variability in patient arrival, poor patient flow due to check in procedures/architectural planning, and resource contentions caused by a lack of medical staff or poorly allocated resources. These circumstances (and others) can force severe implications on an ED, leading to poor patient and staff morale, inadequate patient tracking, medical error and confusion, decreased patient well being, reduced throughput, and increased operating costs.

For years, many healthcare professionals have turned to traditional simulation tools in an effort to gain operational foresight and have struggled to rectify the key issues that contribute to excessive patient wait times and poor operational efficiency. In theory, these simulation tools seem to be an adequate option to explore when looking to achieve a solution to such operational setbacks, but why is it that so many of these projects have failed?

In the case of traditional tools, creating the graphical model actually generated code that is then sent to the SIMAN engine, a technology from decades past. As our model expanded and the detailed reality of the environment was created, we were required to continue modeling in an intermediate programming, scripting environment, or the SIMAN engine itself. It was found that accurately modeling the environment beyond simple pretty pictures not only took a substantial amount of time (and therefore money), but also demanded an incredible amount of knowledge. The software required an unnecessarily large workload to get a glimpse of the operation as a whole – but what about validation, optimization, scenario analysis and using the tool as an integral part of the organization's continuous improvement program? After all, isn't process improvement the main focus?

Unlike the previously mentioned approach, Simcad Pro is the only patented dynamic technology that eliminates the fundamental draw back encountered using traditional simulation tools – the coding requirements. This next generation functionality brings users back to the core of process improvement, allowing for immeasurable breakthroughs in simulation modeling and optimization alike.

By importing a CAD file of the ED, we were able to keep the appropriate scale of the triage area, processing stations, beds, and waiting rooms easily and accurately; ensuring that the travel distances for service providers as well as patients would be tracked for further layout analysis. Creating the model is as simple as placing registration, triage, waiting room, etc. processes onto the Simcad canvas and the skeleton (including both 2D and 3D animation) of the virtual ED is readily created, using the convenient drag and drop interface. Although we had the option to enter our model parameters (timings, capacities, buffers, resource requirement) manually, it was possible to dynamically import these items using the built-in import/export wizard. The wizard proves useful in saving valuable time while various scenarios are analyzed. Using actual historical data ensured that the natural effect of statistical distribution wouldn’t skew the data, and added to the ever present variability that we were looking to mitigate. Once the process flow was mapped, historical data (including arrival rates) was imported, and the model ran; in order to ensure a valid flow and accurate results compared to historical data.

Identifying the poorly performing areas of the ED can be quickly achieved by observing the visual back up of patients, and through several built in reports that can be accessed at anytime throughout (or after) the simulation run. (We found that the Simulation Analysis Report was specifically useful as it provided a clear and concise view of the poorly performing areas for resources, processes and top level model activity of the ED).

Integrated reporting, live model feedback, and suggestions from CreateASoft's process improvement team made running through the various patient arrival scenarios quite straight forward. Several on-the-fly changes were made to the model (adding resources, experimenting with the number of available beds, adding and removing medical equipment, and even changing the overall patient or process flow. Since we were using our historical data, including patient arrival schedule, indentifying the realistic maximum patient load as well as a typical patient load was quick and simple with the integrated Scenario Analysis capability of Simcad Pro.

Each simulation run was compared as a scenario set, showing the advantages and disadvantages of each scenario. After identifying our top three scenarios based on current assumptions, we then started utilizing the integrated dynamic optimization capabilities of Simcad Pro. Our initial assumption was to increase the number of service providers in the ED, yet after reviewing the optimization and scenarios generated we realized that adding an additional x-ray machine may be beneficial. Initially, our team was not sure that the results were accurate – but once we discussed the reliability of the model compared to historical data, it was clear that the addition of the x-ray machine would provide benefits beyond reducing patient wait time.

With a new perspective, we determined the optimal solution based on the suggested modifications and properly applied an improvement plan – optimization that we KNEW would work. Since we had all of the data to support this acquisition, the additional x-ray machine was purchased and we realized the expected operational improvements throughout the ED. By implementing these operational changes we not only reduced patient wait time, but increased our patient throughput, saw our service provider’s utilization drop and efficiencies sky rocket. In addition, with the additional diagnostic equipment strategically placed, we collectively reduced the distance service providers had to walk over the course of one day significantly.


Edited by moderator Monday, June 15, 2015 9:33:14 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.